An Editorial -- Obama's Oil Leak Response Shows No Sense of Urgency
We don't blame President Obama for the oil well leak. And we don't blame him for not stopping it. (For that matter, we don't blame BP either; we think they really want to shut it off as soon as possible.)
But we are greatly disappointed by his response to the emergency. It has been a "what me worry?" epic resembling President Bush's "You're doing a great job, Brownie" in the midst of Hurricane Katrina.
Obama seemed to understand what needed to be done when, according to his p.r. people, he said: "Plug the damn hole." But what has he done? Has he mobilized equipment? Has he personally asked foreign governments for help? Has he convened a White House summit of top oil executives and scientists to discuss what can be done -- now -- to plug the leak, and how government can help? Of what can be done to protect marshes, fisheries and beaches? If BP's ceo is having trouble getting supplies to the Gulf, has Obama offered the Navy to help get them there?
His response reminds us of a comment by Peter Amodio, a career New Jersey bureaucrat, years ago: "If it doesn't get done today, it will get done tomorrow. If I don't do it, someone else will."
This is an emergency, but when Louisiana asked for permission to create some sand bars to protect its marshes, the government said it had to comply with environmental laws that dictate lengthy environmental reviews. Why didn't Obama issue an executive order suspending those requirements? If he couldn't do that, why didn't he call House and Senate leaders to the White House and demand they pass a bill in one day that would suspend those requirements for this emergency?
Obama's response has been basically two things: (1) Repeated statements that BP is responsible and he's going to make them pay for every dime of damage, and (2) sending the Attorney General to the Gulf to lead an investigation to see how many criminal statutes BP might have violated. (A cynic would suggest that investigation start in Washington, where all these drilling plans were approved.)
What is called for now is not pontificating about who's responsible and who's going to pay, nor criminal investigations. What the nation needs is leadership that is focused on just one thing: Stopping the leak and stopping the spreading environmental damage.
We think BP is working as hard as it can. And we think the government team led by Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen is working as hard as it can. But every day oil continues to gush from that pipe, the damage gets worse.
Obama recently said he understands "the buck stops here." But, unlike Harry Truman, he doesn't seem to understand that it's not about understanding, it's about action. Harry Truman didn't hesitate to use the atom bomb to end World War II. When the Russians attempted to starve West Berlin into the Soviet bloc, Truman organized the Berlin airlift to insure food and needed supplies got to the city. When railway workers struck, bringing all passenger and freight lines to a halt for a month, Truman seized control of the railways and threatened to draft the strikers into the military.
Unlike Truman, Obama has failed to act with any sense of urgency. His response brings to mind the comment of another New Jersey political operative, Charlie Smith:
"A politician would always rather talk about a problem than do anything to solve it."
(Published June 3, 2010)
2009 SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BROCHURE AVAILABLE What suppliers and wholesalers need to know to enter our corporate social responsibility awards program is available here.
ANHEUSER-BUSCH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PROGRAM RANKED BEST IN THE BEVERAGE BUSINESS
For the second consecutive year, Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD) has been honored for overall excellence in Corporate Social Responsibility, leading all other beverage companies.
"Anheuser-Busch
is clearly 'the king' when it comes to social responsibility among
beverage companies," said Joel Whitaker, editor of Kane's Beverage News Daily and Kane's Beverage Week, which sponsors the annual awards competition.
"The breadth of its programs and the effectiveness with which they are executed sets the standard."
Particularly
impressive is how Anheuser-Busch's corporate social responsibility
programs delivered value to the company's bottom line. While many
companies have proclaimed their support of recycling, for instance,
Anheuser-Busch actually recovers and recycles in its own facilities
five aluminum cans for every four packaged. The company operates the
world's largest Bio-Mass Recovery System and is installing solar energy
arrays at many of its breweries.
All alcohol beverage companies
work hard to promote responsible alcohol consumption. Anheuser-Busch's
programs range from "We I.D.," a program that reminds retailers to
check IDs to prevent sales of beer to underage people, to working with
law enforcement in Connecticut and Indiana to provide outdoor
advertising reminding drivers to use seatbelts and designated drivers,
to backing the Federal Trade Commission's "We Don't Serve Teens"
program with advertising in national publications, or billboards and in
stores.
Anheuser-Busch also provides philanthropic support to
nonprofits that support its business objectives and which help to make
the communities in which A-B operates better places in which to live,
work and raise a family.
Here is a complete list of winners, by category:
Diageo North America,
Norwalk, Conn. -- Cause Branding for DrinkiQ.com, a global resource to
help combat alcohol abuse and to promote responsible drinking by
sharing best practice tools, information and initiatives.
Anheuser-Busch Inc.,
St. Louis -- Corporate-Community Partnership for working with Bi-Lo, a
grocery chain in Tennessee and Georgia, to promote A-B's "We ID"
campaign.
Anheuser-Busch Inc., St. Louis -- Best Corporate Social Responsibility Report.
Anheuser-Busch Inc., St. Louis -- Environmental Programs (described above).
Brown-Forman Corp.,
Louisville -- employee communications for the environmental issue of
Straight Up, a publication that provided employees with information
about Brown-Forman's environmental programs, and why they are not
merely "nice" or "green dressing" but critical to its bottom line. For
example:
"The company may see specific and direct impacts
from climate change," the issue says. "White oaks, essential to the
maturing process, could be weakened or lost as parasites move with the
shifting climate. California's vineyards may be hard hit by changes in
rainfall and snowmelt pattern. There are likely to be increased
pressures on farmers to supply enough adequate corn and other essential
ingredients."
Anheuser-Busch Inc., St. Louis -- Philanthropy for its support of the American Red Cross during disasters.
Book Review: 'The King of Vodka' is the Book of the Year
The King of
Vodka: The Story of Pyotr Smirnov and the Upheaval of an Empire
By Linda Himelstein To get right to
the point: This is the book of the year. Are you a marketer?
You'll benefit tremendously from understanding how the Smirnoff brand was built
-- not once, but twice -- using viral marketing techniques. Are you a
public health advocate who wants to increase bev/al taxes -- or tax soft drinks
-- to pay for health care? You'll benefit from reading how dependence on
alcohol taxes turns government into a promoter of intemperance. Are you a
business strategist? You'll profit from reading Pyotr Smirnoff's Unique
Selling Proposition: "He sold high-quality vodka at exceptionally
low prices." Is yours a
family business? Read how, following Smirnov's death, his sons appointed
ousted some outside advisors and named their wives to an oversight committee
with authority to verify financial reports and "investigate any
questionable or suspicious actions by management or the board."
"Having the Smirnoff women in charge of an oversight was an easy,
efficient way to consolidate information and influence within the bounds of the
family." What makes this
book so valuable is that it does not look at the Smirnoff business just in
terms of the company itself, but rather it puts it the context of what happened
in Russia
in general. This book is of
value not just to people in the beverage business, or business in general --
although anyone interested in business will benefit by reading it. Those
interested in defense matters can learn again the lesson of the American Civil
War -- a brave and valiant army will always lose when confronted by a better
equipped, better led, better trained opponent. It has been 50
years since a book detailed the horrors of Stalin's Soviet
Union. If you've forgotten -- or never learned -- the
horrors of the Russian Revolution, you can learn them in this book. By the
mid-1920s, the Smirnov brand had virtually ceased to exist. All the
production facilities had been nationalized by the Soviets, the brand no longer
existed in the Soviet Union, and Pytor Smirnov's descendents were scattered,
powerless and, with one of two exceptions, penniless. What happened
next is as improbable as Pyotr's rise from serfdom to the top of Russian
society. One of his sons, who had been a playboy and horsebreeder, found
himself in Paris
facing starvation. "The
Smirnovs and the vodka heritage were on their way to obscurity," the
author notes. "Then, in a bizarre twist of fate, an enterprising
Russian-born American, living thousands of miles across the ATlantic
Ocean." That
Russian-born American was Rudolph P. Kunett. He had arrived penniless in New York at the age of
27. Before the Russian Revolution, his father had owned a large
plantation and distillery that was believed (in 1912) to be the largest
rectifer and blender of liquor in the world. Much of the grain harvested
by his family had supplied the Smirnovs. He worked as a
salesman for Standard Oil Co., then got a job with Helena Rubenstein Inc., the
cosmetics firm, where he rose to become general manager. Kunett heard
the Smirnov name was for sale, and, just as prohibition ended, negotiated a
license to produce and market the vodka in the U.S. He opened the
first U.S. vodka plant in Bethel, Conn., in March 1934. But success
didn't come easily. In his first year, Kunett sold just 1,200 12-bottle
cases. By the fifth year, sales amounted to just 5,000 cases. By 1939, he was
on the verge of bankruptcy. He shopped the brand around, sold it to G.F. Heublein & Bros., a family
business best known for A-1 Steak Sauce. Within two years, sales rose to
22,600 cases, and Kunett was president of Heublein's Smirnoff subsidiary,
getting a 5% override on every case sold. Present-day
bev/al marketers will do well to read how viral marketing, including the Moscow
Mule, followed by getting Smirnoff into the first James Bond movie, where it
was "shaken, not stirred," built Smirnoff into America's No. 1
spirits brand, surpassing gin and whisky in American sales. In 2008, the Smirnoff
brand was valued at $4.7 billion. This is an exceptional
book. It's more than just the history of a brand, It's a
meticulously researched history of a family, of a business -- and most
importantly of the social and political environment in which that brand
developed, nearly disappeared, and rose again.
Audio Interview: How Strange Wines Survived a Devastating Fire -- What You Can Do to Prepare
Katherine Strange
built her business from a one-woman wine brokerage to one that uses 10 sales
representatives to sell and distribute boutique and imported wines.
And yet, it could have ended in a forest fire
last Thanksgiving weekend.
It didn't, and, in fact, while its office was
destroyed, its customers and winery suppliers never missed a beat.
Learn what Strange Wine did -- and what steps you need to take to insure your business isn't damaged by fire or other disaster. Just click the button to the right.
Move
prospects UP or out with 3x48:How to
Tele-Prospect Effectively
By Nathan Jamail
These days, many companies are coming to the same conclusion: In order to make
their sales numbers, the sales team cannot rely merely on existing databases,
but must go out and get new business -- in some cases, a lot of new
business.Over the past couple years,
many businesses have gotten comfortable seeing sales growth from current
customers and good, old fashioned word-of-mouth.And because of this success, many sales
leaders are discovering just how out of commission their sales teams really are -- discipline and practice must be re-instilled.
Just because
sales in your industry might be down 25%, it doesn't mean your company
has to be down 25%.A company can
increase sales in any economy by increasing their share of the market. And
keeping in mind that a sales leader's goal is to capture more of the
marketplace, it is important your team reaches as many people as possible. For
that, we have tele-prospecting.Unfortunately many salespeople don't like tele-prospecting, but the
truth is, in order to grow the business your sales team will not only need to
do it, but be effective at it!
Here's the
scenario: How many times do salespeople in your organization leave the same
voicemail for a prospective client over, and over, and over again?It's common practice for many sales reps to
make a call, leave a message and then schedule a follow-up call in their
calendars for the following month or so. While this process creates activity,
it very rarely creates results.
First, the prospect receives hundreds of calls
every month, so by the time your sales rep calls back two months later, he
doesn't remember the first call.
Second,
the calls are so infrequent that the prospect is easily able to ignore the call
and hope it goes away.
Third, while most
people hate getting rejected, they hate rejecting others even more. Compare it
to your personal life. How many times have you known someone who wants to break
up with her significant other, but doesn't want to do the rejecting, so she
tries to make him mad so that he breaks up with her? Business is no
different.A prospect would rather
ignore the salesperson than reject him.
Here's where
tele-prospecting comes in. The 3x48 program will not only put an end to the
scenario above, but it will move the process along and allow a salesperson to
move the prospect up -- to a possible client -- or out of the call rotation
altogether. This is referred to the "move them up or out" program.Here is how it works:
The salesperson
will make three calls, each one 48 hours apart. For example:The first call Monday, the second Wednesday
and the third Friday.Each call has a
different goal, and each is a step to get the prospect to return the call.
Call Number
One:
The goal of the
first call is to introduce yourself to the prospective client and ask him or
her to call you back. Here's an example:
"Hello my name
is John Smith and I'm with ABC Company.The reason for my call is to introduce myself to you and to offer you a
free business analysis of your 2009 sales plans.We have helped many clients increase their
profits in difficult and changing markets. I would greatly appreciate it if you
would call me back at 972-555-0000.Thanks and have a wonderful day."
Call Number
Two:
The goal of the
second call is to let the prospect know you are following up to the call you
left a couple days ago.
"Hello Mr.
Prospect my name is John Smith with ABC Company. I left you a message a couple
days ago and wanted to follow up with you regarding your free business
analysis.Again my phone number is
972-555-0000.Thanks again and I look
forward to hearing from you soon."
Call Number
Three:
The goal of the
third call is to let the prospect know you are not trying to pester him, and
give him permission to reject you (this call is key).
"Hello Mr.
Prospect, this is John Smith with ABC Company. I know I left you a couple
messages this week and don't mean to be overbearing, but I want to make sure I
do a good job following up and let you know that I would love the opportunity
to visit for few minutes.I was hoping
you would do me a favor and let me know if either (A) you would like to talk to
me but you have just been too busy, or (B) you don't feel it would be a good
time for us to meet and would prefer I don't call again.I know your time is valuable and I would
appreciate your direction as to how to proceed next.Thanks again and have a wonderful day."
This method is
successful because:
·The
calls are close enough to each other that the prospects remember you (after the
third call, they definitely know who you are).
·The
prospects start to think that if they don't call you back you may never stop
calling.
·You
gave the prospects permission to reject you, so they feel more comfortable
calling you back.
·You
are assertive but not aggressive. Your calls are consistent and direct, but not
generic or too "salesy."
Prospecting is
the worst part of any sales position; you might compare it to the bar exam for
lawyers or spring training for baseball teams.But much like in baseball, to have spring training is not good enough to
win; the coach and team must work hard every day, just as salespeople must
continuously tele-prospect to increase their business. The companies that play to win will get new customers and
take the market share.
Nathan Jamail, president of the Jamail Development Group
and author of "The Sales Leaders Playbook," is a motivational
speaker, entrepreneur and corporate coach. As a former Executive Director for
Sprint, and business owner of several small businesses, Nathan travels the
country helping individuals and organizations achieve maximum success. His
clients include Radio Shack, Nationwide Insurance, Metro PCS, and Century 21.
To book Nathan, visit www.NathanJamail.com or contact 972-377-0030.
How to Build a Winning Distributorship without Major Brands
Luck and key decisions have enabled Click Wholesale Distributing to grow
from a six person Seattle, Wash., start-up with first year revenue of
just $2 million to what is expected to be a $20 million operation next year
with 64 employees.
Just a few weeks ago, it was named the Craft
Beer Distributor of the Year by the National
Beer Wholesalers Association and the Brewers
Association.
To hear Rick Steckler, president, tell how the company did it, click the button to the right.
Copyright 2009 Kane's Beverage News. All Rights Reserved